If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Ericka Kammerer wrote:
Opera tends to be an acquired taste. It's hard to appreciate opera without doing your homework so that you understand the story and something about the music itself. It is *much* easier to understand it if you see the opera in person. If you do it a few times, you'll start seeing it in a whole new light. The music isn't as melodramatic as it might seem from the "outside." Best wishes, Ericka This is why I thought it so shortsighted that the local opera company offers no discount tickets for families. When DD started to express an interest in opera, I tried to get affordable tickets, and there were none to be had. I understand that it is very expensive to produce and opera, of course, but the producers also have to understand that not every family can afford $75/seat (no discount for children) and accommodate that somehow. It could be half price day-of-show, or half price for dress rehearsal, or SOMETHING, but they had *nothing* that I, as a parent, could bring my middle-school daughter to (at the time when she was deciding whether to apply to the vocal music program at the arts high school). Now she goes for free with her HS vocal music class, because dress rehearsals are free for HS student groups if the school wants to participate. But when she was in middle school, they wouldn't allow me to organize such a group based on her voice teacher's students, or anything outside of an organized school group. College students can get cheap ($20) tickets, though...but by then you're competing for a *very* scarce resource ($20 for a college kid could be a lot) and it's even developmentally later. Seems to me if you can expose a kid in middle school, and keep them through high school, you're building your college and beyond audience. Sue |
Ads |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Tia Mary-remove nekoluvr to reply wrote:
From: (Texasxsgal1) While opera (and viloins and organs) drive me nuts, i Just love the skirl of the bagpipes ....... The actual sounds of opera don't bother me at all -- it's just that I have no idea what is being "said" :-)! I've also wondered about what sounds llike forced melodrama to my ear. Wagner is a bit bombastic (not to mention rather long- winded ;-) but when you start to "get" it, it seems less melodramatic and makes more sense. It sure isn't Mozart, though! Ericka is right -- I have never really been exposed to opera in person and I am sure that makes a big difference in enjoying it. It does make it a lot easier to follow the story, but more than that, the music sounds different in person too. Despite being a classical musician, I don't have all that many classical recordings. I really don't enjoy *any* classical recordings *nearly* as much as I enjoy them live, so I always find the recordings rather disappointing. I really should have more recordings now that the kids are getting more into music. Adrian was learning a simple version of a tune from Dvorak's New World Symphony on piano (the part with the famous french horn tune), and I didn't even have a recording to play for him so he could hear how the orchestral version sounded! As for the pipes -- I LOVE bagpipes of all sorts! I am especially fond of the Uiellian (sp?) pipes but any bagpipe music is "music to my ears". I love 'em too. Best wishes, Ericka |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Linda D. wrote:
I never said the book had to be "fun", I just feel it would be beneficial to attempt to offer a book that would be of interest to all the students in a first year English class. Why would one assume a dystopian science fiction book exploring the possible consequences of a right-wing patriarchal extremist society would be uninteresting to men (or anyone else)? I would think it would generate fascinating class discussions and be far more accessible than many other novels. I just don't like pigeonholing people that way. Plus, the wonder of literature is that it gives access to different world views. What's the point of reading only about what one has personally experienced? ;-) Btw, my son isn't looking for *fun*, he's a Grad student in a Masters program for Computer Science. He took the English course just in case he decided to go into Education, but has since decided not to.. I would certainly hope he isn't in it just for fun (though I would also hope that he *does* at least find elements of fun in his chosen areas). But I don't get how encountering an important, well-written, insightful novel could put someone off literature or education. What would your son say about an English major taking an intro computer course (to broaden his or her horizons) who objected to learning, say, the c programming language because he or she thought java was more relevant personally? I suspect your son would recognize that one has to start somewhere with *a* language, and that learning *any* language helps build a foundation for understanding programming concepts and learning other languages and would bristle at the notion that students should expect that each of them should be taught the language each felt most relevant to him- or herself at the moment. Best wishes, Ericka |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
On 1/16/04 8:48 AM, in article ,
"Dianne Lewandowski" wrote: Linda D. wrote: Big snip! What does Gucci have to do with diamonds? I don't 'get' that part Ask Cheryl. She was intimating that I'm some hoity toity person who wears diamonds and designer clothing just because I believe that "humanities" should be a part of school curriculum. First, I said I didn't want to got to the classical events, I didn't want the local nouveau "cultured" looking down their collective noses at ME. Of course they'd be looking down their noses at the students, the senior citizens and anyone else not chic. Dianne, there is no doubt you have very strong feelings about the arts, not all of us do. I don't care if my kids ever go to an opera or read Shakespeare or see a Picasso. My mother didn't like that "stuff" either. Thank the gods I had grandparents, a father, aunts, uncles and teachers and schools who insisted upon it and surrounded me with it. I'll bet you were never exposed to it. Or that your family said: "Classical music? Yuck! Hate the stuff!" That's very common. As is the notion that it only belongs to those uppity ups who dress up in tuxes and gowns. That is called a cultural war. A totally slanted view. One needn't be rich or uppity to enjoy the richness of finer culture. But it is true that the local "opera house" has a dress code that includes ties and no jeans and designates "formal nights". I was quite taken aback at the book my son's English Instructor chose for them to read in English 116 at college. I don't know if you've heard of it, but it's called "A Handmaids Tale", Why would any English teacher assign a book that is so geared to women is beyond me. What a great way to turn off guys to literature. Not familiar so can't comment. Dianne Great book - you'd like it! Cheryl |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
|
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Susan Hartman/Dirty Linen wrote:
This is why I thought it so shortsighted that the local opera company offers no discount tickets for families. When DD started to express an interest in opera, I tried to get affordable tickets, and there were none to be had. I understand that it is very expensive to produce and opera, of course, but the producers also have to understand that not every family can afford $75/seat (no discount for children) and accommodate that somehow. It could be half price day-of-show, or half price for dress rehearsal, or SOMETHING, but they had *nothing* that I, as a parent, could bring my middle-school daughter to (at the time when she was deciding whether to apply to the vocal music program at the arts high school). Now she goes for free with her HS vocal music class, because dress rehearsals are free for HS student groups if the school wants to participate. But when she was in middle school, they wouldn't allow me to organize such a group based on her voice teacher's students, or anything outside of an organized school group. College students can get cheap ($20) tickets, though...but by then you're competing for a *very* scarce resource ($20 for a college kid could be a lot) and it's even developmentally later. Seems to me if you can expose a kid in middle school, and keep them through high school, you're building your college and beyond audience. True. I don't know what you have in your area, but you could maybe keep your eyes peeled for recitals. They tend to be inexpensive or free. It's not the same as seeing a full blown opera, but you at least get to hear "real" singing. Are there any programs in your area not hosted by the specific companies? For instance, in DC there's Stages for All Ages, which has inexpensive tickets for children. You are very limited in which performances and the number of tickets, but if you call early you can get tickets for kids for a reasonable price. Since I think our kids have too many toys, we try to encourage "experiences" for birthday gifts. My oldest will soon be nine years old and my parents are fishing around for a show to take him to. Last year, they took him to the ballet to see Peter Pan, and it was terribly expensive at full freight (but he really loved it). Best wishes, Ericka |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Cheryl Isaak wrote:
First, I said I didn't want to got to the classical events, I didn't want the local nouveau "cultured" looking down their collective noses at ME. Of course they'd be looking down their noses at the students, the senior citizens and anyone else not chic. Why would you think they'd be doing that? I go whenever I get the chance, and the only people I've ever seen "looked down at" were people with no concert manners (talking during the performance, cell phones/pagers making noise, kicking the seat in front, etc.). There's usually a very wide range of ages and types in the audience That's part of what makes it fun--great people watching during intermission! Best wishes, Ericka |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Tia Mary-remove nekoluvr to reply wrote:
Not being a musician, I love it live or recorded :-)! I probably ahve as many classical recordings as I do "regular" music. #1 on my car radio is the PBS station that plays classics from 9 to 3 during the day. DD has grown up listening to it and she is doing the same for the SMDGD. That is an excellent plan. It really, really makes a difference, just like learning a foreign language. When you get the sounds in your ears, your brain learns to make sense of it, and the earlier you're exposed the better. You can see this as an adult if you try to develop an appreciation for non-Western music. In the beginning, it just sounds like noise because your ears can't make sense of it. If you study and listen for quite some time, you'll get to a point where it starts sounding "normal" because you've finally trained yourself to make sense of it. My son's piano teacher says she can always tell which children have been exposed to classical music and which haven't, because those that have are able to make more sense of the music and play with more musicality much earlier. I always figure it's a very good thing to keep children's options open by exposing them to many things while young just in case they take to it later on. I have thought long and hard about just *why* I like classical music so much. I am the only one in the family with an affinity for it. I have decided that it's a result of being the first generation to grow up with television and cartoon shows. Have you ever watched any of the old cartoons? The music is almost *always* one of the great classics! So I grew up watching fun stuff on the telly and listening to classical music at the same time! Add to that the absolute WONDER of seeing Fantasia when young and I was hooked for life :-))! Ya' think maybe that's why I get a kick out of Bugs Bunny doing Flight of the Valkyries??? Absolutely. The older cartoon music is *fabulous*, even the stuff that isn't poached from the classical literature. It's a shame so much of the film/tv/cartoon music now is so lacking. Much of it now is just throwaway music (with some notable exceptions, of course). Best wishes, Ericka |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
|
#70
|
|||
|
|||
I'll tell you the story of a volunteer that was told to take her efforts elsewhere. She found several interesting opportunities for "enrichment" in science, history (Strawberry Bank trip), music ( a Jewish folk group) and a thought for the fifth grade trip (traditional a play). The weather was great - fit in perfectly for the science curriculum. The music was referred up to the middle school - the general music program (as opposed to instrument track) where was a better fit. (1-3 is primarily choral work, followed by introduction of instruments and introduction of classical works.) The history didn't fit - the curriculum was for a "farming village" not a port town. The play wasn't even close - meant for 16-18 year olds not 9-11 year olds and on a subject not covered in that grade. So - please book the buses for the trip to the play the teachers picked (a musical about colonial life). Here's the phone number. Never did, why?, cause it didn't fit what she wanted the kids to see. Didn't want to play by the rules, so screwed the students out the trip and the committee out of the $800 cost. Because she wanted it her way and told the rest of the world to blow when she didn't get it. She is not welcome at any PTA in town now and had her dues returned to her. Frankly, I wouldn't mind having a concerned and dedicated non parent and new comer ask what they could do to help. But if there was no "fit", we'd point her (or him) a better direction. I guess there is no better direction, locally, for you. But you made the choice to move where you did (and I am not saying you had other viable options), your input was not welcomed, stop tearing your self up over it. You will self destruct other wise. Actually I don't. I'd prefer to fund schools on a local level. Period, end of story, no entitlements, no Title One funds, nada. Well, without Title One funds (or is that Title Nine?), this district would be worse than it is. However, I agree that there are too many mandates which are not funded. Title One is "literacy", Title IX is equal funding of sports programs for males and females. But a "village" is my town. I pay taxes in MY town. So what happens here is my direct responsibility, No - you have a secondary responsibility, to pay taxes. You aren't on the school board or a member of the PTA or a have a student, so you do not have a direct responsibility for education. Cheryl |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OT - Computer Error Message | Tinkster | Beads | 0 | September 14th 04 10:39 AM |
Message in a Bottle Kit | Keith C | Marketplace | 0 | August 23rd 04 07:57 PM |
Message in a Bottle Kits | Keith C | Marketplace | 0 | July 8th 04 07:27 PM |