If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Sarah wrote:
If that's your budget, I recommend looking at 30-40 year old Singers. Specifically the 401 and 401A. Solid machine, great straight stitch, and many useful decorative and utility stitches. You may be able to find a re-conditioned one at a repair shop or one which someone (foolishly) traded in at a sewing machine shop. They come up on eBay frequently, too. I've got a 401 or two and agree with Sarah. Other great old machines I've got are a Singer 306 but it takes a hard-to-find needle, a Pfaff 230 which runs like a top, and an Elna Supermatic. Machines like these can often be had for under $200, and are a far better investment. -- Joanne @ stitches @ singerlady.reno.nv.us http://bernardschopen.tripod.com/ Life is about the journey, not about the destination. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
In article .com,
of http://groups.google.com uttered As a point of interest, my wife's Singer Touch and Sew has cheezy gears that have been replaced several times and the reason we switched to the Brother after the last failure. Ah yes. The infamous Touch and Jam - not one of their better models. If you lurk awhile on the ISMACS and FeatherweightFanatics mailing lists/ digest you will undountedly learn more - probably, in fact, more than you ever wished to know, -- AJH no email address supplied |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
" wrote:
"Jenn Ridley" I wan't being rude, I was just wondering, since the first thing I said was "don't buy a cheap machine from a discount store", and you came back with two cheap machines from a discount store. Someone has got to defend the cheap discount store machine so it might as well be me. I bought a Brother for $159 at Walmart and see no reason why a beginner (as I was/am) would be turned off by it. The only reason it was that expensive was because of the one step buttonhole feature that I wanted. I'm not denying that there are good inexpensive machines. The problem is that most beginning sewists have no way of knowing whether the machine they've picked is a cheap machine or a good inexpensive machine. You can't try them out in a box store. The clerks at the box stores don't usually know either. (And even if that model was good last year, it may be built in a different factory this year.) Many of us have stories of friends/relations who thought they couldn't/were awful at/hated sewing, but when given a chance to use a good machine, found that it was their cheap machine they hated/couldn't use. -- Jenn Ridley : |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"BEI Design" Not me! I'll take older, sturdier, proven-reliable *anything* any day over a "new", "tinny", "flashy" POC. YMMV Not sure what those acronyms mean but I certainly agree with what I do understand. Problem is, as our experience and Irene's with older Singers shows is that old or big name isn't always good anymore than expensive is. Frankly, most of the glitz on newer machines (cheap or expensive) is useless nonsense. Who needs any of those wierd looking stitches? Certainly not a beginner. As I said, I got two perfectly nice machines on Ebay for $25 but unless one is mechanically inclined, the chances of getting a working used machine is pretty slim unless purchased from a retailer where it can be test driven but then it will cost as much as a low end new machine. Furthermore, beginners have no idea what to look for when test driving. Buying a low end machine at a discount store has the great advantage of being returnable without a hassle if unsatisfied. Not so easy on Ebay and shipping costs take the fun out of a $25 machine. BTW, I have no use for my 1912 Singer and will sell it for $20 more than I paid for it if anyone is interested. That comes to about 10 cents an hour for my fixing time. js -- PHOTO OF THE WEEK: http://schmidling.com/pow.htm Astronomy, Beer, Cheese, Fiber,Gems, Sausage,Silver http://schmidling.com |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
" wrote:
"BEI Design" Not me! I'll take older, sturdier, proven-reliable *anything* any day over a "new", "tinny", "flashy" POC. YMMV Not sure what those acronyms mean but I certainly agree with what I do understand. POC=Piece of crap YMMV=your mileage may vary Problem is, as our experience and Irene's with older Singers shows is that old or big name isn't always good anymore than expensive is. "Older Singers" means 1940-1950. 1960-1980 Singers were not good. Singers' been building machines since the 1890's. As I said, I got two perfectly nice machines on Ebay for $25 but unless one is mechanically inclined, the chances of getting a working used machine is pretty slim unless purchased from a retailer where it can be test driven but then it will cost as much as a low end new machine. Yeah, but they'll work *much* better. And if you get it from a real sewing machine store, you can get *lessons*. Personally, given a choice between a refurbished 1965 Pfaff and a 2005 Brother for the same price, I'm gonna get the Pfaff. It'll sew better, and probably last longer. -- Jenn Ridley : |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
IMS wrote in
: Not me! I'll take older, sturdier, proven-reliable *anything* any day over a "new", "tinny", "flashy" POC. YMMV ******APPLAUSE****** I use this same analogy all the time On the electric scooter lists, I always tell people that they can buy the Bic pen of electric scooters -- those cheap Chinese scooters -- or they can spend money to buy a pen that will last for years and years. But people don't seem to want to spend $500-1000 on a scooter that will last for years and instead prefer to spend $100-200 on one that isn't goign to last 3 months, and then they think they are all junk. -- Where no oxen are, the crib is clean, But much benefit is derived from the labor of the ox. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Melinda Meahan - remove TRASH to reply wrote: "BEI Design" wrote: So, if someone asked you about a car purchase, and one of their choices was a Yugo, and the other was a 20-year old Mercedes at the same price, you'd be Ok with recommending the Yugo? Not me! I'll take older, sturdier, proven-reliable *anything* any day over a "new", "tinny", "flashy" POC. YMMV ******APPLAUSE****** [curtsying] Thank you kindly, ma'am. ;-) -- Beverly delete nospam and .invalid to reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Please help me identify my New Home Sewing Machine | Frosty772 | Quilting | 2 | June 5th 04 07:49 PM |
Yet Another Sewing Machine Question | Eli | Quilting | 16 | February 29th 04 02:01 AM |
FAQs for Newbies and Longtimers | Diana Curtis | Quilting | 21 | December 8th 03 12:52 PM |
Old Sewing Machine Advice | Diana Curtis | Beads | 9 | August 22nd 03 06:01 AM |