If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Copyright and stealing (ON topic)
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 22:54:14 GMT, "Kathy Applebaum"
wrote: "Listpig" wrote in message ... And in the policy of Complete Disclosure, a quote swiped from Danny Kaye in The Court Jester grinnin and duckin We are very fond of the chalice from the palace and the flagon with the dragon... I just watched that movie again the other night. IIRC a variation of the chalice from the palace is also in the movie A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Forum. Debra in VA See my quilts at http://community.webshots.com/user/debplayshere |
Ads |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Copyright and stealing (ON topic)
I don't get registration materials, because I am an employee. See,
there are just a couple of drawbacks to all this PREshow fun! LOL Hugs, Tina |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
OT Kathy Applebaum Week!! Copyright and stealing (ON topic)
While we're celebrating, let's sing her favorite ditty. "I'm bringing home
a baby bumble bee". (There's just no accounting for her repetoire.) And uh one, and uh two . . Polly |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Copyright and stealing (ON topic)
There is no copyright protection at Quilt fairs/festivals. Look at the
admission forms. If a quilt is submitted for show there is a copyright disclaimer. Also once the picture has been sold to a magazine or paper they have purchased the right to show the photos to the public. I have several attorney friends who have explained this very carefully to me. Copyright protection is a financial term - you can't sell the photos unless they were taken by you. Tina took the photos and they were hers to use as she wished - she didn't STEAL anything because she received no monetary renumeration. If the quilts were protected by law they would never have allowed cameras into the showing. The presenter has already given permission for the quilts to be viewed and photographed so many times before Tina ever laid a camera lens on them. What you are doing is redundant and totally unnecessary as required by law but if it makes you feel better then go for it. Just don't sit in judgement when others don't do what you do. -- http://community.webshots.com/user/snigdibbly SNIGDIBBLY ~e~ " / \ http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/snigdibbly. http://www.ebaystores.com/snigdibbly...ox&refid=store "Kathy Applebaum" wrote in message om... I've been rather bothered over the last few days by the posts indirectly addressing copyright issues here. This is a subject that's been hashed over many times before, and not a lot that's new is ever added to this debate. Still, I feel I need to vent. I've seen several posts advocating the position that it's okay to use copyrighted images or patterns without permission because the designer "should" share with everyone. What I don't get is why permission isn't asked. It's really not that hard to write a simple email. I've asked for permission numerous times, and only been turned down once. (That one time was funny in retrospect, because the design was not particularly original.) Most designers I've talked to are incredibly generous and very flattered that someone would ask. That's the important part: asking. If my neighbor wanted to use my lawn mower, I'd let her borrow it in a heartbeat. But I'd be mighty ticked if I found she had gone into my garage and used it without asking first, as would most of you. Our very own Dr. Quilter is upset because someone went into her house without asking, and rightly so. Many of you know that I'm always happy to spend time answering questions about quilting and longarming. I'm glad to share what I've spent many hours learning because I'm grateful that others were willing to share with me. But I've also had aspiring longarmers call up, posing as potential customers, and try to take my knowledge on the sly. Believe me, that's a VERY unpleasant feeling, especially when I would have been willing to help them out if they'd been honest. Yes, there are times when it's not easy to ask for permission. But there's a real human being on the other side of the equation, who has real feelings, and could feel hurt if someone takes something without permission just because it's inconvenient to ask. Doing the right thing isn't always convenient, but it's still important. Okay, I'm off the soapbox now. You can safely read the newsgroup again. -- Kathy A. (Woodland, CA) Queen of Fabric Tramps http://www.kayneyquilting.com , remove the obvious to reply |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Copyright and stealing (ON topic)
Thanks Kathy, your envelopes came yesterday. This will be put to good use!
Barbara in SC "Kathy Applebaum" wrote in message om... I've been rather bothered over the last few days by the posts indirectly addressing copyright issues here. This is a subject that's been hashed over many times before, and not a lot that's new is ever added to this debate. Still, I feel I need to vent. I've seen several posts advocating the position that it's okay to use copyrighted images or patterns without permission because the designer "should" share with everyone. What I don't get is why permission isn't asked. It's really not that hard to write a simple email. I've asked for permission numerous times, and only been turned down once. (That one time was funny in retrospect, because the design was not particularly original.) Most designers I've talked to are incredibly generous and very flattered that someone would ask. That's the important part: asking. If my neighbor wanted to use my lawn mower, I'd let her borrow it in a heartbeat. But I'd be mighty ticked if I found she had gone into my garage and used it without asking first, as would most of you. Our very own Dr. Quilter is upset because someone went into her house without asking, and rightly so. Many of you know that I'm always happy to spend time answering questions about quilting and longarming. I'm glad to share what I've spent many hours learning because I'm grateful that others were willing to share with me. But I've also had aspiring longarmers call up, posing as potential customers, and try to take my knowledge on the sly. Believe me, that's a VERY unpleasant feeling, especially when I would have been willing to help them out if they'd been honest. Yes, there are times when it's not easy to ask for permission. But there's a real human being on the other side of the equation, who has real feelings, and could feel hurt if someone takes something without permission just because it's inconvenient to ask. Doing the right thing isn't always convenient, but it's still important. Okay, I'm off the soapbox now. You can safely read the newsgroup again. -- Kathy A. (Woodland, CA) Queen of Fabric Tramps http://www.kayneyquilting.com , remove the obvious to reply |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Copyright and stealing (ON topic)
This may be a weird slant on this topic but the fabric designs/prints
themselves are copyrighted, right? So how does that figure into the whole equation? Linda in PA... who often thinks of weird stuff "Julia in MN" wrote in message ... My pet peeve along these lines: people who would never think of stealing a pattern from the store shelves, but who do not think anything of asking to photocopy the copy that someone else purchased. As I understand it, one would find it quite difficult to copyright a quilt block; even though I may design a block that I haven't seen before, the chances are the someone else has also created the same block. For example, IMO there is no way that Quilt-In-A-Day can have a copyright on a log cabin or Irish chain block; they could never prove any copyright infringement on any quilt you make from those very common, traditional blocks. However, the instructions in the Quilt-In-A-Day books are copyrighted; you should not be copying the instructions to pass along to others. When a block design or quilt design gets more innovative and unusual, the situation gets a bit muddier, and it gets more difficult to claim that it is only the pattern instructions that can be copyright. Julia in MN -- This message has been scanned for viruses by Norton Anti-Virus http://webpages.charter.net/jaccola/ |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Copyright and stealing (ON topic)
"Calico" wrote in message news:bar7f.12352$c4.11765@trndny03... This may be a weird slant on this topic but the fabric designs/prints themselves are copyrighted, right? So how does that figure into the whole equation? Some manufacturers have already given permission, some have not. One common example is NFL and Disney fabric -- you are only authorized to make something for your own use, and not authorized to make something to exhibit or sell. So a few years back, when I bought a bunch of Pittsburgh Steelers fabric to make a quilt for a good friend, there was no problem because it was a gift. If I had sold it to him, that would have been (to me, anyway) a very dark grey area. And if I made several to sell on eBay, I would have most assuredly crossed the line. Again, if in any doubt, the best thing is to ask copyright holder. -- Kathy A. (Woodland, CA) Queen of Fabric Tramps http://www.kayneyquilting.com , remove the obvious to reply |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Hand dyed silk (was Copyright and stealing (ON topic))
I'll say! 19mm charmeuse...mmmmmmm I admit it, I am a total silk junkie! Darn near any silk from gauzes to raw to pongee to charmeuse, I am addicted! It helps that when I go into TSWLTH and get a look at the synthetic imitations that just don't measure up, I can also see that they cost three times what the real thing costs. BTW I just sat down and did the $math for DH. He was under the impression I was buying fabric from Dharma because of its superior quality (it is excellent). Actually it is way less expensive than buying locally. Between 8.25% sales tax and having to pay someone to drive me about the shipping charge is a bargin, and even the single yard prices are a lot less than anything I can manage within 50 miles. NightMist On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 22:54:14 GMT, "Kathy Applebaum" wrote: Same way you dye cotton. I bought the 19mm charmeuse from Dharma. Yummy! -- Kathy A. (Woodland, CA) Queen of Fabric Tramps http://www.kayneyquilting.com , remove the obvious to reply "Tina" wrote in message roups.com... I'm in, if you'll teach me how to do that hand dyed silk too! LOL Hugs, Tina, who will even bring the truffles......... -- "To repeat what others have said, requires education; to challenge it, requires brains." -Mary Pettibone Poole |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Copyright and stealing (ON topic)
In article ySo7f.5592$%42.3967@okepread06,
"SNIGDIBBLY" wrote: There is no copyright protection at Quilt fairs/festivals. Look at the admission forms. If a quilt is submitted for show there is a copyright disclaimer. Not exactly. I have entered two national shows and both times the right to photograph my quilts, print pictures of entered quilts in advertisements etc. was only given to the show organizers, not to anyone who chose to take a picture. Also once the picture has been sold to a magazine or paper they have purchased the right to show the photos to the public. The magazine has, yes. But generally only for a specified period of time; unless you're talking Fons and Porter who buy everything forever it seems. Just because the show or magazine has rights is doesn't extend those rights to others who purchase or borrow the magazine or book. Cameras are allowed in shows for people to take pictures for their personal use only. A show attendee is not authorized to take pictures and then turn them into lovely photo greeting cards, puzzles, mugs, posters or anything else to sell. An attendee may not put the photos on public forums so that other people can print off pretty things with a quiltmakers work on it. Just because I bought a quilt magazine doesn't mean I can photocopy off a quilt picture and sell it, or print off pattern instructions and teach it as a class. There are fair use guidelines and both those overstep the bounds. I have several attorney friends who have explained this very carefully to me. Copyright protection is a financial term - you can't sell the photos unless they were taken by you. Tina took the photos and they were hers to use as she wished - she didn't STEAL anything because she received no monetary renumeration. A common misconception. You don't have to make money off something to violate copyright. You do, however have to follow the rules of the show and the rules for Houston are clearly posted at the show and are on the website http://www.quilts.com/fqf05/faqtravelsafe.pdf Scroll down and they are clearly in the box on the right side of the page titled "Photography Rules" If the quilts were protected by law they would never have allowed cameras into the showing. Wrong. The shows rules clearly state "Photography at Festival is neither a right or an entitlement - it is a privilege." The people who run festival - and those who run many shows - allow photography for personal use but if too many quilters disregard copyright, it wouldn't surprise me to begin to see photography banned at shows. There is a very nice question and answer section on copyright on Sylvia Landman's website. You might want to read it. http://sylvias-studio.com/copyright_...s_crafters.htm marcella |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Copyright and stealing (ON topic)
To expand on Kathy's note: Very often, manufacturers who have
that restriction will include the message on the selvage. Something on the order of "Personal Use Only; Do Not Sell Products." PAT in overcast Virginia Kathy Applebaum wrote: "Calico" wrote in message news:bar7f.12352$c4.11765@trndny03... This may be a weird slant on this topic but the fabric designs/prints themselves are copyrighted, right? So how does that figure into the whole equation? Some manufacturers have already given permission, some have not. One common example is NFL and Disney fabric -- you are only authorized to make something for your own use, and not authorized to make something to exhibit or sell. So a few years back, when I bought a bunch of Pittsburgh Steelers fabric to make a quilt for a good friend, there was no problem because it was a gift. If I had sold it to him, that would have been (to me, anyway) a very dark grey area. And if I made several to sell on eBay, I would have most assuredly crossed the line. Again, if in any doubt, the best thing is to ask copyright holder. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|