If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
You keep using economic aberrations as examples. You have no idea what it
costs to manufacture durable goods. I have been designing and build machinery professionally for over 15 years. No, I don't take you seriously. So far, you haven't shown that you know anything about anything. Exactly the opposite. "Warrior_13" wrote in message ... kid? I happen to be 50 yrs old and I know what I am talking about. If you think that a sewing machine that retails for $1000 costs the mfgr more than $100 to produce, you are totally naive. The economy of the world is based on greed and nothing else. Let's take diamonds now; they are plentiful, yet controlled by a cartel that ensures the prices are kept high. To raise the appeal of the item, people think expensive means the best, or in this case "forever". Diamonds are as cheap and plentiful as other stones, this is just an excellent marketing campaign by DeBeers to control the world's supply. And so it goes with everything else. "CW" wrote in message news:12Dsb.138023$ao4.439128@attbi_s51... Take a few economics classes, kid. Then get out in the world and see how things work. You have no idea right now. "Warrior_13" wrote in message ... Do the math. For example, we know that blank cds can be purchased in bulk for 15-25 cents each. Why is a recorded disk $15? Who do you think gets the profit? The vocalist? The songwriter? No, the record company. And you think that is a fair profit? I don't. And just because someone doesn't agree with all of you does not condone name calling or other derogatory remarks about the person. Just say you disagree but don't resort to such childishness. And you all need to learn how to spell! "CW" wrote in message news:%bCsb.185977$Fm2.170333@attbi_s04... I think we have one of two things here (probably both). (1) A troll. (2) Someone (there are a lot of them) that doesn't have any idea what a percentage is. They claim to never buy anything unless it is 50 to 60% off. They (he, she, it) must not own much. Not a lot of places are willing to loose money on a sale. "Penny S" wrote in message ... Warrior_13's cat walked across a keyboard and came up with this: I would tend to disagree. Out of 50 people I know personally, maybe 2 out of 50 will be as frugal as me and take the time and effort to research, visit the local dealer, then go find the best price on line. Most people are impulse shoppers and will buy on the spot, especially if the dealer is a good salesman. And they will pay retail without batting an eye. Remember when the internet was young and we were promised lower prices because the overhead was no longer there? The mfgr websites still sell at retail, as well as the authorized dealers online. Sure they may give you a whopping 10% off, but that is nothing, I want 40-60% off of anything retail. Everything is marked up 500-600%, so even at 40% off they are still making a handsome profit. please give examples ( at least 5) of things that are marked up 500%. I"d love to see you data to back up your claim. Penny S |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
The example was pretty lame. She (he, it) showed no comprehension of what
it took to produce that other than the cost of a blank CD. "Melinda Meahan - take out TRASH to reply" wrote in message ... Warrior_13 wrote: Do the math. For example, we know that blank cds can be purchased in bulk for 15-25 cents each. Why is a recorded disk $15? Who do you think gets the profit? The vocalist? The songwriter? No, the record company. And you think that is a fair profit? I don't. That has nothing to do with your claim that people selling things mark things up "500-600%." That is a value-added thing that has nothing to do with an internet vendor's markup on the goods they sell. -- I know God will not give me anything I can't handle. I just wish that He didn't trust me so much. - Mother Teresa |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Warrior_13 wrote:
kid? I happen to be 50 yrs old and I know what I am talking about. If you think that a sewing machine that retails for $1000 costs the mfgr more than $100 to produce, you are totally naive. You forgot to include the cost of lessons, technical support, and warranty work (all labor costs and fairly expensive) when you calculated what the machine cost. This is why the online people (particuarly allbrands, who is not a dealer and cannot provide warranty work -- I am pretty sure the archives of this or RCTS will say why but I have since forgotten) can get away with selling them so cheaply -- because they provide none of the above, and you are on your own. -- I know God will not give me anything I can't handle. I just wish that He didn't trust me so much. - Mother Teresa |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
CW wrote:
That's a fact. Some have to find out things like this the hard way. There are advantages to buying local. "Yarn Forward" wrote in message . .. But then try to get it serviced on the Internet! Dont expect your local store to do it. Roger. -- Yarn Forward Your On Line Yarn Store http://www.yarnforward.com There are some dealers on the Internet who do service. There are some local dealers who do not. They send machines to the national center. There is one here that does that, because he doesn't know how to service the computerized machines. All generalities are unreliable. ;-) -- Joanne http://members.tripod.com/~bernardschopen/ Life is about the journey, not about the destination. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Melinda Meahan - take out TRASH to reply's cat walked across a keyboard
and came up with this: Warrior_13 wrote: Do the math. For example, we know that blank cds can be purchased in bulk for 15-25 cents each. Why is a recorded disk $15? Who do you think gets the profit? The vocalist? The songwriter? No, the record company. And you think that is a fair profit? I don't. That has nothing to do with your claim that people selling things mark things up "500-600%." That is a value-added thing that has nothing to do with an internet vendor's markup on the goods they sell. He's forgetting the chain of production, and overhead to: take the cd example: the plastic have to be forumulated, processed, all by workers who get paid. Then, the recording... everyone gets paid something ( albeit the industry does take a huge cut) whether they make coffee at the studio, design the case art , push the buttons, pack the CD into cases, drive the truck to the distribution center, run the forklift at the distribution center, load the truck to get it to Wal-Mart or wherever, unload it.. the cashier at the store where you buy it... ( I do agree that CD's are overpriced but that's a different discussion) Fabric... take cotton. Someone grows it, harvests it, gets it to a processor, then a mill. Someone else runs the factory where it's processes, turned into a fabric of some sort. Then maybe it's shipped again ( labor) to a factory where it has it's final finishing ( printing etc) or turned into clothing.... pattern makers, cutters, sewers.... more labor...more distribution... everyone want's a piece of the pie....500% mark up? I don't think so. Penny |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Warrior_13's cat walked across a keyboard and came up with this:
Do the math. For example, we know that blank cds can be purchased in bulk for 15-25 cents each. Why is a recorded disk $15? Who do you think gets the profit? The vocalist? The songwriter? No, the record company. And you think that is a fair profit? I don't. So how do rock stars and pop singers get money for multiple mansions and jets if it not through payouts to the vocalist... are they robbing banks? ps |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Penny S wrote:
Warrior_13's cat walked across a keyboard and came up with this: Do the math. For example, we know that blank cds can be purchased in bulk for 15-25 cents each. Why is a recorded disk $15? Who do you think gets the profit? The vocalist? The songwriter? No, the record company. And you think that is a fair profit? I don't. So how do rock stars and pop singers get money for multiple mansions and jets if it not through payouts to the vocalist... are they robbing banks? ps Artists do get royalties for records (CDs) sold, but it's mere pennies. They make the money on personal appearance tours and that's not an easy way to make a buck. The artistic contributors to CDs make very little per sale. It is the record company that gets the lion's share. It's similar to book royalties, where the author might get 70 cents for the sale of each $25 book, except a book takes more to produce than a CD does. Known artists get paid an advance (as do authors) then the company deducts that advance from royalties due until sales exceed the owed royalties already paid in the advance. If you follow that. The markup on CDs is very high. It is much cheaper to produce a CD today than it ever was. Recording equipment that used to require a building will now fit into a suitcase. The engineering that used to be required to mix tracks is much simpler with computer technology. Burning CDs is much cheaper than pressing vinyl. There is a lot of money being made, but very few artists are seeing much of it. Another area with a large markup is jewelry. Of course, deBeers has controlled diamond prices for decades. They had a big scare when the Iron Curtain came down and there was a danger that the Russians would flood the market. Apparently Russian diamonds are not only plentiful, but of outstanding quality. A deal was done. Plastics are very cheap to produce, but the original mold-making is costly. So, there has to be sufficient sales to cover the initial costs. This is where we end up paying through the nose, because sewing machines, knitting machines, and the like do not sell in huge quantities. The companies that produce these things are not going to take any chances on losing money, so they price accordingly. Probably one of the products that has the biggest markup is athletic shoes, especially now that nearly all of them are being made with cheap labor. The materials are inexpensive, each unit requires only a little material, yet finished shoes retail in the hundreds. There is a large advertising budget. The only way the manufacturers can get away with this is that people buy their products. If people were to stop buying, or demand value for their money, the market would change. -- Joanne http://members.tripod.com/~bernardschopen/ Life is about the journey, not about the destination. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
"CW" wrote:
It means a lot to most people that they can go to the store that they bought the thing from and get service and advice. Try that on line. Sure, on the internet you're not going to get the service you would from a local retailer. I'm sure no one would disagree with that. Is that a reason to put restrictions on retailers? If people really felt there was a huge value-add that came from buying locally, then they would disregard the good deals they can find on the internet and buy locally. In theory, manufacturers wouldn't have to make any restrictions on the vendors at all if the demand were really there for all that service. In my opinion, they are alienating a growing part of the population who are internet savvy and don't necessarily see the value-add in the service (or who are willing to give that up for the lower initial price). Realistically you can get your sewing machine serviced at any local retailer even if you didn't buy your machine there. You go back and forth on your next point: The manufacturers put these restrictions on the dealers to keep people from going to their local sewing machine dealer , trying out a machine, asking questions and otherwise taking up that dealers time then going online and buying at the cheapest price. [snip] Manufacturers are not doing the local dealers a favor, they are ensuring a quality of service to their customers. So which is it? Are the manufacturers putting these restrictions in place to protect the local dealers or are they trying to force people to go to the local dealer so customers receive better service? Do you really think that the sewing machine companies actually care if the local dealers become a demo facility? I really doubt that... That's the local business's problem, not Bernina's. The bottom line is that manufacturers want to sell machines. Perhaps a more likely rationale is that they find it is more profitable to have more sales through local retailers, since the service and value-add make for happy customers, who, consequently, are more likely to buy a machine of the same brand in the future. Business is business. There's something in it for them. You mentioned car manufacturers among the businesses that have similar restrictions. This is a good point. I understand that these two industries are drastically different. By no means am I making a direct comparison here... One difference between the car industry and the sewing machine industry is that the car industry has adapted to the existence of the internet and the flurry of information that is out there for consumers to read before making a purchase. They have altered their business model to cater to more educated consumers - the types of people that will research endlessly before a purchase. In fact, many dealerships now have an internet sales division, where they rely not on the profit made on each car (which has the potential to be much lower if you know the invoice, etc.), but instead rely on volume of sales. The sewing machine business has not adapted to this yet, it seems. And my guess is that more and more sewing machine consumers will be relying on the internet for information in the future, so maybe we'll see a change in how things work. By not adapting, any industry will risk alienating potentially profitable customers. Perhaps soon we'll be able to pay 10 dollars and get the "invoice" price from Consumer Reports of the latest machines? :-) I really have no idea about the inner workings of the sewing machine industry, you see, but I found it much more frustrating to buy a sewing machine than my most recent new car. Anyway, that's my $.02. Take it or leave it, I suppose :-) Robyn |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
I bought on-line and saved $2300 US........The nearby dealer will service
it......and I can pay for lots and lots of service for the difference. The "feel-good" aspect of it did not matter as much as the money to me. Had it nearly 2 years and have not needed service yet....... "Robyn" wrote in message om... "CW" wrote: It means a lot to most people that they can go to the store that they bought the thing from and get service and advice. Try that on line. -------------clipped--------- |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Robyn wrote:
that a reason to put restrictions on retailers? If people really felt there was a huge value-add that came from buying locally, then they would disregard the good deals they can find on the internet and buy locally. Actually, what I see happen all the time -- not just in sewing machines but in lots of other things -- is that people take hours of the full-price sellers' time to collect information and all and then go buy it on the internet, usually smirking about what a good deal they got and how they managed to do all their research for free. Well, it wasn't *really* free -- it's just that someone else has to pay for it. I guess I have a sensitive conscience, because to me that feels like stealing. -- I know God will not give me anything I can't handle. I just wish that He didn't trust me so much. - Mother Teresa |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Please help me identify my New Home Sewing Machine | Frosty772 | Quilting | 2 | June 5th 04 07:49 PM |
Yet Another Sewing Machine Question | Eli | Quilting | 16 | February 29th 04 02:01 AM |
FAQs for Newbies and Longtimers | Diana Curtis | Quilting | 21 | December 8th 03 12:52 PM |
Old Sewing Machine Advice | Diana Curtis | Beads | 9 | August 22nd 03 06:01 AM |