If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
LNS in Alabamastan - Ping Gillian
On Feb 27, 8:39*pm, Olwyn Mary wrote:
wrote: On Feb 27, 2:42 pm, Karen C in California wrote: wrote: You can refuse to answer such calls or hang up on them. If you hang up, they continue to call on a daily basis; sometimes multiple times a day. *Much faster to simply argue with them once that he no longer lives here and be done with it. Further, since I'm not a mind-reader, how do I know which calls to refuse to answer? *Caller ID? *"Private number" could be my mother. 800-800-8000 could be a new client. *It's a bigger PITA to walk to the other side of the house to be able to hear the answering machine screening the calls than to simply pick up the phone where I am and find out who's calling. As I said, he couldn't be annoying you without your complicity. *You wanna blame it on him, that's fine, but you're clearly playing along. Elizabeth I think you are being somewhat harsh, Elizabeth. *There has been a fair Probably a bit, but this isn't just anyone. It's someone who claims to have tons of legal and political connections. I wouldn't be putting up with this crap and I don't see why she does. amount in our local papers in the past about women being stalked and harassed by exes, and it seems the police are powerless to enforce restraining orders. *Also, as to the collection phone calls, I had a friend in that position and it went on night and day until Congress passed a law that they could only call between 8 a.m. and 9 p.m. She even changed her phone number to an unlisted one, and the collectors found it - I think through the DMV or somewhere. *She was in a parents' group I ran for a number of years, and finally she had to get a lawyer (also a member of the group) to threaten the collection agency before they stopped. But the point is that she got a lawyer and they did stop. Karen has plenty of access to lawyers. AND by using her phone number, he is not only committing harassment, but also fraud. Surely there are ways to stop him that might take only a little bit more energy than she expends complaining about him. Elizabeth |
Ads |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
LNS in Alabamastan - Ping Gillian
On Feb 27, 10:12*pm, "Jinx Minx" wrote:
On Feb 27, 2:42 pm, Karen C in California wrote: If you hang up, they continue to call on a daily basis; sometimes multiple times a day. *Much faster to simply argue with them once that he no longer lives here and be done with it. Further, since I'm not a mind-reader, how do I know which calls to refuse to answer? *Caller ID? *"Private number" could be my mother. 800-800-8000 could be a new client. *It's a bigger PITA to walk to the other side of the house to be able to hear the answering machine screening the calls than to simply pick up the phone where I am and find out who's calling. Well...... You could set up your phone to reject private and unidentified numbers. *You could have your mother dial *82 before dialing your number which would reveal her number on your caller ID so you can be assured it's her calling. "Private" numbers are almost always from private residences, not businesses. "Unknown" numbers are almost always from businesses, not private residences. At least, that's how it works with the caller ID from my phone company. *I would also think, that any business that is large enough to warrant having an 800 number, probably is large enough to not need to outsource proofing/editing/paralegal work to a private individual off the 'net. *If they're really looking for you to do work for them, they'll leave a message. And if I were a collector, someone saying "he doesn't live here anymore" certainly wouldn't sway me to not keep calling. *I'm fairly certain that's a common response that people give to avoid creditors when they start calling. I'm sure they're sitting on the other end of the phone thinking "yeah, right--he doesn't live here". I asked myself, if I were in your shoes, just how would I handle this? First, I'd get two phone numbers. *Re-assign your current number for business only (it's a tax deduction), that way you don't lose any customers that may have it on file. *Get a new number for personal calls, and keep it unpublished. *Only give it to your friends, and do not give it to any businesses when you write checks or pay your bills--once it gets reported to the credit bureaus associated with your accounts, it's as good as published. Then, when the business number rings, don't just say hello, give your business a title and answer the phone with it always ("ACME Editing, this is Karen"). *It's more professional, anyway. *It gives you a LOT more credibility with the erroneous creditor calls that they really do have the wrong number than if you just answer hello and then have to defend that the number isn't his. *And don't tell them "he doesn't live here anymore"--just tell them they have the wrong number, this is a place of business. *If creditors can in any way prove you have any connection to him, they'll continue to harass you in order to get to him. I think all of that is excellent advice, Jinx. Elizabeth |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
LNS in Alabamastan - Ping Gillian
wrote in message ... On Feb 27, 10:12 pm, "Jinx Minx" wrote: On Feb 27, 2:42 pm, Karen C in California wrote: If you hang up, they continue to call on a daily basis; sometimes multiple times a day. Much faster to simply argue with them once that he no longer lives here and be done with it. Further, since I'm not a mind-reader, how do I know which calls to refuse to answer? Caller ID? "Private number" could be my mother. 800-800-8000 could be a new client. It's a bigger PITA to walk to the other side of the house to be able to hear the answering machine screening the calls than to simply pick up the phone where I am and find out who's calling. Well...... You could set up your phone to reject private and unidentified numbers. You could have your mother dial *82 before dialing your number which would reveal her number on your caller ID so you can be assured it's her calling. "Private" numbers are almost always from private residences, not businesses. "Unknown" numbers are almost always from businesses, not private residences. At least, that's how it works with the caller ID from my phone company. I would also think, that any business that is large enough to warrant having an 800 number, probably is large enough to not need to outsource proofing/editing/paralegal work to a private individual off the 'net. If they're really looking for you to do work for them, they'll leave a message. And if I were a collector, someone saying "he doesn't live here anymore" certainly wouldn't sway me to not keep calling. I'm fairly certain that's a common response that people give to avoid creditors when they start calling. I'm sure they're sitting on the other end of the phone thinking "yeah, right--he doesn't live here". I asked myself, if I were in your shoes, just how would I handle this? First, I'd get two phone numbers. Re-assign your current number for business only (it's a tax deduction), that way you don't lose any customers that may have it on file. Get a new number for personal calls, and keep it unpublished. Only give it to your friends, and do not give it to any businesses when you write checks or pay your bills--once it gets reported to the credit bureaus associated with your accounts, it's as good as published. Then, when the business number rings, don't just say hello, give your business a title and answer the phone with it always ("ACME Editing, this is Karen"). It's more professional, anyway. It gives you a LOT more credibility with the erroneous creditor calls that they really do have the wrong number than if you just answer hello and then have to defend that the number isn't his. And don't tell them "he doesn't live here anymore"--just tell them they have the wrong number, this is a place of business. If creditors can in any way prove you have any connection to him, they'll continue to harass you in order to get to him. I think all of that is excellent advice, Jinx. Elizabeth Yeah, if only it would be heeded..... No tolerance for martyr complexes, Jinx |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
Trouble with Xes
"Karen C in California" wrote in message ... lucretia borgia wrote: No tolerance for martyr complexes, Jinx Now that was my breakfast laugh lol I do not have a martyr complex. I have a psychopathic ex who meets all the criteria for being a psychopath, who has a history of stalking every woman who's ever dumped him. "You made me miserable, now I'm going to make you miserable." I've moved on successfully from numerous other relationships, where, by mutual agreement, he went his way and I went mine. The problem here is that he WON'T go away. He doesn't care what's moral or legal, he only cares about ruining my life the way that the divorce ruined his. Unfortunately, if you check with the police instead of just assuming they'll do something, they will tell you that the victim has to actually incur serious physical injuries before the police can do anything about threats. He's not fool enough to get into a physical altercation with me such that the police will get involved. He's smart enough to know what the police will not get involved in, and he's going to continue doing what he knows he can get away with because the police WON'T do anything about it. There are ex-wives out there who have died because the police won't/can't do anything until there's a physical attack; the ex-husband knows he's got one chance and he makes it count. In this case, he's sticking only to psychological warfare, because he knows no one can do anything effective to stop him. It says something that his favorite movie is "Gaslight". A mutual friend hinted that the plan was to follow the plan in that movie, to get me committed, and then he'd move into the house and live rent-free (this address was on his license, so if I'm locked up, who's to say he's not living here with my permission?) and loot my bank accounts, but seeing what I was going through, the friend refused to testify and make himself a target of the same sort of revenge, and I don't blame him. Don't judge when you don't know all the facts. -- But Karen, you've told us all "the facts" more than enough times that I think we have heard enough to judge. And if you don't want us to judge--stop beating us all over the head with your life story!! It's that simple. Keep your private life private. Absolutely no one here gives a **** about your ex-husband. I guarantee you that. Jinx |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
LNS in Alabamastan - Ping Gillian
"Karen C in California" wrote in message ... The problem is, this month it's Bank A calling about his Visa, next month it's Bank B calling about his Mastercharge, the month after that, it'll be Discover. The month after that, he'll bounce a check to some Mom & Pop store where he really doesn't expect them to spend the money to pursue it in court, but they will call the number on the check to try to collect. (He's not going to do it at Safeway, which has in-house lawyers who do nothing but sue on bounced checks.) So just getting ONE place to stop calling me is not the problem. Each place does tend to stop calling after being told once that we've been divorced for years and years, and here's the case number (which contains the year) to prove it, but then someone else calls the next month. I'd have to figure out every credit card he's in the process of applying for, every store he's ever going to shop at, and head him off at the pass. There's a zillion-and-one credit card companies out there, and by next month, it'll be a zillion-and-five. It takes a lot less time and money to put out fires as they occur than to try to stay two steps ahead of him, sending preventive letters to every bank in the world and every little store within 50 miles as each new one opens (which means keeping an eye on the new business licenses issued in half a dozen counties). But this way I have to deal with it that I'm being reminded of his existence every 4-6 weeks, which makes it very difficult to forget that he exists. And that's the way he wants it. Really?? You really think he does this deliberately JUST to harass you?? Do you really think you were such a fantastic catch that he's so bitter you left him that he never wants you to forget he exists?? Maybe it's just to cheat and steal and get away with it more easily and nothing more than that. Lots of people give out fake phone numbers--it's more often a tactic of evasiveness than a tactic of revenge. But what do I know.... Jinx |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
Trouble with Xes
On Mar 1, 12:17*am, Karen C in California wrote:
[snip] Unfortunately, if you check with the police instead of just assuming they'll do something, they will tell you that the victim has to actually incur serious physical injuries before the police can do anything about threats. *He's not fool enough to get into a physical altercation with me such that the police will get involved. This is actually not correct. A friend of mine's X got a judge to agree that the friend could no longer put his son on the bus in the morning. The order arrived on a Friday afternoon and she delivered it to the police on Sunday. I live in a small enough city that the police kindly enough tracked down my friend to tell him that if he showed up at the bus stop on Monday morning and she called, they would have to arrest him. The police may have told you that in 1998, but the reality has changed quite a bit since then (not enough perhaps, but quite a bit). He's smart enough to know what the police will not get involved in, and he's going to continue doing what he knows he can get away with because the police WON'T do anything about it. The police came and told my tenant's X to get off our property when my husband called to report that she was threatening the tenant's girl- friend (who is also my tenant), so that's simply not correct. But that's actually beside the point anyway. We're not talking about getting the police involved because he's threatening you physically (apparently he's not). That's not the kind of restraining order I mean. You can get an order telling him to cease and desist using your information, including your phone number. You can have him charged with fraud for using your information to apply for credit. I could have sworn you said you knew enough to be a lawyer....but you haven't figured out legal ways to get this creep to leave you alone? Hard to fathom. Elizabeth |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
Trouble with Xes
On Mar 3, 2:02*pm, Karen C in California wrote:
He knows what he can get away with scot-free, and he's going to do it because he knows it will annoy me. Yup. And how much of your time did you just give him now, explaining something to me that I couldn't care less about, about him? You give him time and energy even when he doesn't ask for it. BTW, your .sig is obnoxiously long. Elizabeth |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
Trouble with Xes
On Mar 4, 10:53*am, Karen C in California wrote:
wrote: Yup. *And how much of your time did you just give him now, explaining something to me that I couldn't care less about, about him? If you don't care, then why did you ask? I didn't. Elizabeth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|