View Single Post
  #5  
Old September 15th 03, 01:19 PM
Dianne Lewandowski
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jim is correct, except:
For surface work when you want a rope-like effect, as in Portuguese stem
stitch, or coral knot. There you don't want to strip.

Anytime you want a flat appearance and greater coverage of the thread,
you must strip the strands apart before stitching. Without a laying
tool of some kind, however, when using more than 3 strands, you'll be in
trouble. A laying tool can be a thumbnail or needle, by the way.

Dianne

F.James Cripwell wrote:

Ruthie ) writes:

Hi, Jenn!
(snip)
In the floss, I used 12 strands, and I can see some spots where I could
have used more. But the stitches may also have been affected by my
inexperience.

I would also think that better coverage could be had by using six
strands and doing cross-stitch.

JMIO (I is "inexperienced")

Ruthie




Just a little note here. I think most people realise the importance
of "stripping" threads from the 6 ply strands of embroidery floss.
Otherwise you tend to run into trouble with twisting as the length of the
thread shortens. However, there have been people in the past who forget
this when they use all six strands together. They just cut the appropiate
length, thread the needle and start stitching. If you are using all six
strands of floss, it is still important to solemnly strip each strand out
of the original floss, and recombine them before starting to stitch.
Clear as mud? HTH.

--
Jim Cripwell.
The gods do not subtract from the allotted span of one's life, any
time that is spent in stitching.
Adapted from a sign on The Cobb, Lyme Regis, England.


Ads